Diagnostic Impact of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI in 205 Patients with Ischemic Stroke or TIA

Jeffrey Ross Editor's Choices

Editor’s Choice

This was a single-center, retrospective study of 205 consecutive patients who were referred for vessel wall MR imaging to clarify the etiology of an ischemic stroke or TIA. An expert panel classified stroke etiology before and after incorporating vessel wall MR imaging results using a modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment system. Vessel wall MR imaging altered the etiologic classification in 55% (112/205) of patients. The proportion of patients classified as having intracranial arteriopathy not otherwise specified decreased from 31% to 4% (64/205 versus 9/205) and the proportion classified as having intracranial atherosclerotic disease increased from 23% to 57%. When vessel wall MR imaging is performed to clarify the etiology of a stroke or TIA, it frequently alters the etiologic classification, which is the basis for therapeutic decision-making.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Representative case with conventional stroke work-up with negative findings and altered etiologic classification after VW-MR imaging. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (A) shows an acute infarct in the left MCA lenticulostriate territory. MRA anterior-posterior (B) and craniocaudal (C) projections show no/minimal narrowing of the left MCA (arrows). Sagittal T2-weighted VW-MR imaging (D) shows a cross-section through the left MCA (dashed arrow), and a magnified view (inset box) shows focal, eccentric, thickening of the superior-posterior wall of the left MCA (solid arrows). Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted VW-MR imaging (E) shows the same vessel (dashed arrow) with corresponding wall enhancement (solid arrow). The VW-MR imaging appearance is consistent with atherosclerotic plaque, and the enhancement is a finding more common in recently symptomatic plaque. Adapted with permission from Schaafsma et al.23

Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke depends on determining the cause of the initial ischemic event, but standard investigations often fail to identify a cause or identify multiple potential causes. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of intracranial vessel wall MR imaging on the etiologic classification of ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of 205 consecutive patients who were referred for vessel wall MR imaging to clarify the etiology of an ischemic stroke or TIA. An expert panel classified stroke etiology before and after incorporating vessel wall MR imaging results using a modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment system. We measured the proportion of patients with an altered etiologic classification after vessel wall MR imaging.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years (interquartile range = 44–67 years), and 51% (106/205) of patients were men. Vessel wall MR imaging altered the etiologic classification in 55% (112/205) of patients. The proportion of patients classified as having intracranial arteriopathy not otherwise specified decreased from 31% to 4% (64/205 versus 9/205; P < .001) and the proportion classified as having intracranial atherosclerotic disease increased from 23% to 57% (48/205 versus 116/205; P < .001). Conventional work-up classification as intracranial arteriopathy not otherwise specified was an independent predictor of vessel wall MR imaging impact (OR = 8.9; 95% CI, 3.0–27.2). The time between symptom onset and vessel wall MR imaging was not a predictor of impact.

CONCLUSIONS

When vessel wall MR imaging is performed to clarify the etiology of a stroke or TIA, it frequently alters the etiologic classification. This is important because the etiologic classification is the basis for therapeutic decision-making.

Read this article: http://bit.ly/32HTAdJ 

Diagnostic Impact of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI in 205 Patients with Ischemic Stroke or TIA